<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4294</link>
    <description>The High Court confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the return on investment as per the memorandum of understanding but disagreed with restricting the interest payment to 18 per cent. The court allowed the appeal related to the assessment of rental income and interest deduction, emphasizing the need for compliance with the law in determining the amount payable by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4294</link>
      <description>The High Court confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the return on investment as per the memorandum of understanding but disagreed with restricting the interest payment to 18 per cent. The court allowed the appeal related to the assessment of rental income and interest deduction, emphasizing the need for compliance with the law in determining the amount payable by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>