https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185014 An appeal under the Indian Forest Act was construed broadly enough to cover the earlier Forest Settlement Officer order admitting the claim, even though the memorandum referred to a later recording order, because the challenge was to the substance of the adjudication. For limitation, where an order affecting rights is made without notice, time runs from actual or constructive communication or knowledge, not merely the date written on the order. Applying that principle, limitation was counted from the date the Forest Department became aware of the order, so the appeal was within time and not barred. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:23:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185014 An appeal under the Indian Forest Act was construed broadly enough to cover the earlier Forest Settlement Officer order admitting the claim, even though the memorandum referred to a later recording order, because the challenge was to the substance of the adjudication. For limitation, where an order affecting rights is made without notice, time runs from actual or constructive communication or knowledge, not merely the date written on the order. Applying that principle, limitation was counted from the date the Forest Department became aware of the order, so the appeal was within time and not barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185014