https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185012 Temporary injunction to restrain use of the word "Skyline" in an educational institution's name was declined because the expression was shown to be in widespread use and not distinctive enough to confer exclusive rights. Applying the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury and equity, the SC found no sufficient showing of deception or confusion to justify restraint. It further reiterated that appellate interference with a discretionary order on temporary injunction is warranted only where the discretion is arbitrary, perverse or contrary to settled principles. The refusal to restrain the respondents was upheld and the modified injunction was set aside. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:08:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185012 Temporary injunction to restrain use of the word "Skyline" in an educational institution's name was declined because the expression was shown to be in widespread use and not distinctive enough to confer exclusive rights. Applying the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury and equity, the SC found no sufficient showing of deception or confusion to justify restraint. It further reiterated that appellate interference with a discretionary order on temporary injunction is warranted only where the discretion is arbitrary, perverse or contrary to settled principles. The refusal to restrain the respondents was upheld and the modified injunction was set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185012