<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330527</link>
    <description>Section 4-BB of the U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948 allowed deduction of tax already paid on raw material and packing material used in manufacturing notified goods, and the provision was construed literally as a beneficial relief measure. The Court held that no statutory basis existed to proportionately reduce the set-off merely because part of the finished goods was sold to tax-exempt purchasers, since the language did not distinguish between taxable and exempt sales. The proportionate apportionment of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the full statutory set-off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:11:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330527</link>
      <description>Section 4-BB of the U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948 allowed deduction of tax already paid on raw material and packing material used in manufacturing notified goods, and the provision was construed literally as a beneficial relief measure. The Court held that no statutory basis existed to proportionately reduce the set-off merely because part of the finished goods was sold to tax-exempt purchasers, since the language did not distinguish between taxable and exempt sales. The proportionate apportionment of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the full statutory set-off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>