<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Air-Conditioner Classification Dispute: Appellant&#039;s Claim Denied; Two-Ton Split Unit Correctly Classified Under CTH 8415 83 10.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30512</link>
    <description>Classification of import of general brand split type air-conditioner - mere assertion without meeting common parlance test and elementary principles of jurisprudence that Generelia specialibus non derogant General things do not derogate for special , appellant fails to succeed since two ton split air-conditioner subscribes to the CTH 8415 83 10 instead of the CTH 8415 10 10. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:50:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Air-Conditioner Classification Dispute: Appellant&#039;s Claim Denied; Two-Ton Split Unit Correctly Classified Under CTH 8415 83 10.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30512</link>
      <description>Classification of import of general brand split type air-conditioner - mere assertion without meeting common parlance test and elementary principles of jurisprudence that Generelia specialibus non derogant General things do not derogate for special , appellant fails to succeed since two ton split air-conditioner subscribes to the CTH 8415 83 10 instead of the CTH 8415 10 10. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:50:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>