<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4284</link>
    <description>The Civil Appeal challenged a judgment by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the mis-declaration of imported goods to evade duty. The respondent, a State Government-owned Corporation, imported goods declared as &quot;Polyethylene Wide Specs&quot; but faced discrepancies in test values. Despite the inconsistencies, the court upheld the transaction value aligned with the contract value, considering the quantity and price involved in the import. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, emphasizing the importance of accurate declaration in import processes to avoid duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4284</link>
      <description>The Civil Appeal challenged a judgment by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the mis-declaration of imported goods to evade duty. The respondent, a State Government-owned Corporation, imported goods declared as &quot;Polyethylene Wide Specs&quot; but faced discrepancies in test values. Despite the inconsistencies, the court upheld the transaction value aligned with the contract value, considering the quantity and price involved in the import. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, emphasizing the importance of accurate declaration in import processes to avoid duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>