<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1110 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on MRP based assessment with interest but set aside the denial of CENVAT credit and dismissed the recovery of Central Excise duty and penalties. The appellant&#039;s argument that no penalty should be imposed due to lack of deliberate suppression of liability was accepted. The invoices provided did not show evidence of clandestine clearance, leading to the dismissal of charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1110 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on MRP based assessment with interest but set aside the denial of CENVAT credit and dismissed the recovery of Central Excise duty and penalties. The appellant&#039;s argument that no penalty should be imposed due to lack of deliberate suppression of liability was accepted. The invoices provided did not show evidence of clandestine clearance, leading to the dismissal of charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>