<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4283</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the transaction value between the assessee and the related party for excise duty assessment, emphasizing that pricing similarity across sales channels negated the influence of their relationship on pricing. The Court noted the finality of the decision regarding allegations of clandestine removal of goods, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4283</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the transaction value between the assessee and the related party for excise duty assessment, emphasizing that pricing similarity across sales channels negated the influence of their relationship on pricing. The Court noted the finality of the decision regarding allegations of clandestine removal of goods, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>