https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330504 The judge ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the appeals and setting aside the orders for disallowance of credit on input services. The judge emphasized the broad scope of input services and held that the denied services were essential for the manufacturing business. The ruling highlighted that services need not be received at the factory premises but should be used directly or indirectly in the manufacturing process. The appellants successfully argued that the denial of credit on fabrication services was unjustified, citing relevant case laws to support their position. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330504 The judge ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the appeals and setting aside the orders for disallowance of credit on input services. The judge emphasized the broad scope of input services and held that the denied services were essential for the manufacturing business. The ruling highlighted that services need not be received at the factory premises but should be used directly or indirectly in the manufacturing process. The appellants successfully argued that the denial of credit on fabrication services was unjustified, citing relevant case laws to support their position. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330504