<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 736 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184951</link>
    <description>A budget speech or proposal made in Parliament does not, by itself, become law. The operative law is the Finance Act as enacted, so any inconsistency is resolved by the statute rather than the proposal. On that settled principle, the Court found no error apparent on the record and no basis to invoke review jurisdiction. The review petition was therefore rejected on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:22:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 736 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184951</link>
      <description>A budget speech or proposal made in Parliament does not, by itself, become law. The operative law is the Finance Act as enacted, so any inconsistency is resolved by the statute rather than the proposal. On that settled principle, the Court found no error apparent on the record and no basis to invoke review jurisdiction. The review petition was therefore rejected on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>