<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 110 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4273</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the order to keep the criminal proceedings in abeyance until the appeal related to penalty proceedings was decided. The judgment emphasized the interrelation between tax and criminal proceedings, highlighting the need for coherence in legal actions and the impact of one on the other.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 110 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4273</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the order to keep the criminal proceedings in abeyance until the appeal related to penalty proceedings was decided. The judgment emphasized the interrelation between tax and criminal proceedings, highlighting the need for coherence in legal actions and the impact of one on the other.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>