<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1072 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the definition of &quot;place of removal&quot; and the eligibility of credit for loading and delivery charges related to the clearance of final products up to the place of removal. The disallowance of credit on loading and delivery charges was set aside, and penalties imposed were nullified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1072 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the definition of &quot;place of removal&quot; and the eligibility of credit for loading and delivery charges related to the clearance of final products up to the place of removal. The disallowance of credit on loading and delivery charges was set aside, and penalties imposed were nullified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>