<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330468</link>
    <description>The appellant was found eligible for service tax credit on repair and maintenance services and erection and commissioning services related to a water pipe line outside the factory premises. The Bombay High Court emphasized a broad interpretation of &quot;input services,&quot; stating that services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products are eligible for credit. Precedents were cited to support the appellant&#039;s case, showing that services outside the factory premises could still be eligible for credit if related to the manufacturing process. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330468</link>
      <description>The appellant was found eligible for service tax credit on repair and maintenance services and erection and commissioning services related to a water pipe line outside the factory premises. The Bombay High Court emphasized a broad interpretation of &quot;input services,&quot; stating that services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products are eligible for credit. Precedents were cited to support the appellant&#039;s case, showing that services outside the factory premises could still be eligible for credit if related to the manufacturing process. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>