https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330465 The Court dismissed the appeals, finding them devoid of merit. The appellant's claims regarding budget proposals, tariff rates, notification issuance, and discrimination were not upheld. The Court emphasized the importance of enacted law over budget proposals and executive discretion in notification issuance. The appellant's arguments lacked sufficient evidence and failed to establish a violation of legislative or constitutional provisions. The Court did not address the issue of interest on the alleged excess duty paid, as the primary relief was not granted. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330465 The Court dismissed the appeals, finding them devoid of merit. The appellant's claims regarding budget proposals, tariff rates, notification issuance, and discrimination were not upheld. The Court emphasized the importance of enacted law over budget proposals and executive discretion in notification issuance. The appellant's arguments lacked sufficient evidence and failed to establish a violation of legislative or constitutional provisions. The Court did not address the issue of interest on the alleged excess duty paid, as the primary relief was not granted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330465