<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1060 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330462</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the orders revoking the CHA license. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits under the relevant regulations and highlighted the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in matters concerning license revocation. The judgment underscored the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, ultimately deeming the revocation of the CHA license unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1060 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330462</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the orders revoking the CHA license. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits under the relevant regulations and highlighted the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in matters concerning license revocation. The judgment underscored the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, ultimately deeming the revocation of the CHA license unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>