<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi VAT Act: TDS Not Dependent on Labor Dominance in Works Contracts, Section 36A(2) Clarifies.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30483</link>
    <description>TDS under DVAT - works contract - dominant part of the contract - labour/ service or material - The word “dominant” is not to be found in Section 36A(2) of the DVAT Act. In fact, there is nothing in the said provision which suggests that unless the dominant part of the works contract is labour and service, the lower deduction will not be permissible. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:56:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi VAT Act: TDS Not Dependent on Labor Dominance in Works Contracts, Section 36A(2) Clarifies.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30483</link>
      <description>TDS under DVAT - works contract - dominant part of the contract - labour/ service or material - The word “dominant” is not to be found in Section 36A(2) of the DVAT Act. In fact, there is nothing in the said provision which suggests that unless the dominant part of the works contract is labour and service, the lower deduction will not be permissible. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:56:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>