<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1057 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330459</link>
    <description>Classification under a fiscal entry depends on common parlance and the product&#039;s primary use, with the revenue bearing the burden of proving taxability under the claimed entry. Applying that approach, Mediker was treated as an anti-lice medicament manufactured under a drug licence and used for therapeutic and prophylactic treatment, so it was not a shampoo or cosmetic and was not liable to entry tax. Revive instant starch was found to be tapioca-based starch used for washing clothes, not a chemical in common parlance, and no material supported classification under the chemicals and acids entry. On that basis, entry tax on both products was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1057 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330459</link>
      <description>Classification under a fiscal entry depends on common parlance and the product&#039;s primary use, with the revenue bearing the burden of proving taxability under the claimed entry. Applying that approach, Mediker was treated as an anti-lice medicament manufactured under a drug licence and used for therapeutic and prophylactic treatment, so it was not a shampoo or cosmetic and was not liable to entry tax. Revive instant starch was found to be tapioca-based starch used for washing clothes, not a chemical in common parlance, and no material supported classification under the chemicals and acids entry. On that basis, entry tax on both products was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>