<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1045 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330447</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the provision for outstanding electricity fuel surcharges and expenditure on arrear fuel surcharges were allowable as business expenditures under Section 37 of the Act, despite the bill receipt timing. The Court emphasized that liabilities incurred should be provisioned for when maintaining books on a mercantile basis, regardless of bill receipt, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s contentions on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1045 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330447</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the provision for outstanding electricity fuel surcharges and expenditure on arrear fuel surcharges were allowable as business expenditures under Section 37 of the Act, despite the bill receipt timing. The Court emphasized that liabilities incurred should be provisioned for when maintaining books on a mercantile basis, regardless of bill receipt, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s contentions on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>