<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 63 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4265</link>
    <description>Substantial compliance with an exemption notification was treated as sufficient where the assessees deposited the duty-equivalent amount in an escrow account, informed the department, opened separate accounts, and executed the required tripartite agreement. The Tribunal found no diversion or misutilisation of either the principal or the interest, and held that minor procedural lapses could not defeat the exemption when the notification&#039;s development objective for the North-East Region had been fulfilled. The duty demand, interest demand, and penalties were set aside. The Tribunal also extended the time for withdrawal from the escrow account and subsequent utilisation, because departmental action had prevented timely compliance and further directions were needed to make the relief effective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 63 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4265</link>
      <description>Substantial compliance with an exemption notification was treated as sufficient where the assessees deposited the duty-equivalent amount in an escrow account, informed the department, opened separate accounts, and executed the required tripartite agreement. The Tribunal found no diversion or misutilisation of either the principal or the interest, and held that minor procedural lapses could not defeat the exemption when the notification&#039;s development objective for the North-East Region had been fulfilled. The duty demand, interest demand, and penalties were set aside. The Tribunal also extended the time for withdrawal from the escrow account and subsequent utilisation, because departmental action had prevented timely compliance and further directions were needed to make the relief effective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>