https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184940 A landlord who had obtained final permission under section 3 of the U.P. Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 was not barred from invoking section 43(2)(rr) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 after an earlier eviction suit failed on a technical ground and not on merits. The prior dismissal as infructuous did not invalidate the permission or exhaust it for later statutory use. The retrospective amendment making explicit that an application could be made even if a suit had already been instituted confirmed that the legislative scheme permitted reliance on the same final permission. The objection to maintainability was rejected. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:29:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184940 A landlord who had obtained final permission under section 3 of the U.P. Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 was not barred from invoking section 43(2)(rr) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 after an earlier eviction suit failed on a technical ground and not on merits. The prior dismissal as infructuous did not invalidate the permission or exhaust it for later statutory use. The retrospective amendment making explicit that an application could be made even if a suit had already been instituted confirmed that the legislative scheme permitted reliance on the same final permission. The objection to maintainability was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184940