<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330438</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, waiving penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s good faith actions, legal interpretations, and retrospective statutory amendments led to the favorable outcome. However, the request for adjustment of excess tax paid was denied due to insufficient documentary evidence. The decision was pronounced on 13.07.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330438</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, waiving penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s good faith actions, legal interpretations, and retrospective statutory amendments led to the favorable outcome. However, the request for adjustment of excess tax paid was denied due to insufficient documentary evidence. The decision was pronounced on 13.07.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>