https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330424 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the appellant, concluding that the refund for higher duty paid on lead acid batteries cleared to a government undertaking was correctly sanctioned without unjust enrichment. The judgment emphasized the appellant's burden of proof to demonstrate non-passing of duty incidences and referenced legal precedents to establish refund eligibility criteria. The decision underscores the intricate legal considerations in refund claims and unjust enrichment disputes. en-us Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:50:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330424 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the appellant, concluding that the refund for higher duty paid on lead acid batteries cleared to a government undertaking was correctly sanctioned without unjust enrichment. The judgment emphasized the appellant's burden of proof to demonstrate non-passing of duty incidences and referenced legal precedents to establish refund eligibility criteria. The decision underscores the intricate legal considerations in refund claims and unjust enrichment disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330424