<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1006 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in both issues. It held that no disallowance under Section 14A was warranted as no exempt income was earned. Additionally, the addition under Section 41(1) was deemed unjustified without evidence of liability cessation or remission. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that the provisions of Section 41(1) did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1006 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in both issues. It held that no disallowance under Section 14A was warranted as no exempt income was earned. Additionally, the addition under Section 41(1) was deemed unjustified without evidence of liability cessation or remission. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that the provisions of Section 41(1) did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>