<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1002 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330404</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. The claim for carry forward of business loss was dismissed due to exceeding the 8-year limit. However, the set-off/carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation was allowed indefinitely following a relevant amendment removing the 8-year restriction. Additionally, the disallowance of interest payment was overturned as the Tribunal found the higher interest rate justified. The order was pronounced on 11-07-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1002 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330404</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. The claim for carry forward of business loss was dismissed due to exceeding the 8-year limit. However, the set-off/carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation was allowed indefinitely following a relevant amendment removing the 8-year restriction. Additionally, the disallowance of interest payment was overturned as the Tribunal found the higher interest rate justified. The order was pronounced on 11-07-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>