<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 665 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184916</link>
    <description>The High Court considered an appeal regarding the interpretation of completion of export for the assessment year 1993-94, with reliance on a decision of the Bombay High Court. The Tribunal had remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for determining whether the goods crossed frontiers for export completion. Despite acknowledging the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision as currently binding, the High Court found the lack of clarity in the records on this issue and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision for reassessment. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal and the connected miscellaneous petition without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:41:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 665 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184916</link>
      <description>The High Court considered an appeal regarding the interpretation of completion of export for the assessment year 1993-94, with reliance on a decision of the Bombay High Court. The Tribunal had remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for determining whether the goods crossed frontiers for export completion. Despite acknowledging the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision as currently binding, the High Court found the lack of clarity in the records on this issue and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision for reassessment. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal and the connected miscellaneous petition without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>