https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184909 Repeated opportunities had already been granted in the settlement proceedings, so refusal of a further adjournment and proceeding ex parte was not arbitrary or illegal on the facts and did not by itself vitiate the order. However, the settlement application raised material factual objections, including alleged multiple counting of single entries and resulting inflation of turnover, and those grounds were not properly examined. Because the order failed to address the substance of the proposal, the HC quashed it and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184909 Repeated opportunities had already been granted in the settlement proceedings, so refusal of a further adjournment and proceeding ex parte was not arbitrary or illegal on the facts and did not by itself vitiate the order. However, the settlement application raised material factual objections, including alleged multiple counting of single entries and resulting inflation of turnover, and those grounds were not properly examined. Because the order failed to address the substance of the proposal, the HC quashed it and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184909