<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 997 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief of not being liable for service tax, but upheld the penalty under Section 75A for default in filing returns and obtaining registration certificate. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for its decision on each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 997 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief of not being liable for service tax, but upheld the penalty under Section 75A for default in filing returns and obtaining registration certificate. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for its decision on each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>