https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330396 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed service did not align with the goods transport agency category despite the service recipient having paid service tax under that classification. The Tribunal also found that a significant portion of the demand was time-barred. As a result, the appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set timeframe, with dismissal of the appeal as the consequence of failure to comply. en-us Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:35:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330396 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed service did not align with the goods transport agency category despite the service recipient having paid service tax under that classification. The Tribunal also found that a significant portion of the demand was time-barred. As a result, the appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set timeframe, with dismissal of the appeal as the consequence of failure to comply. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330396