<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330393</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, a detention officer acting under the goods detention provisions may require payment of tax or security for release of goods, but has no statutory authority to levy penalty. Section 71(3), being a penal provision for offences and consequential proceedings, could not be invoked in the course of detention proceedings. Amounts collected on release of detained goods must therefore be treated in accordance with the detention power exercised and not recharacterised as penalty. The amount paid for release was directed to be treated as tax, while the assessee was left free to pursue any adjustment remedy available under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:33:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330393</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, a detention officer acting under the goods detention provisions may require payment of tax or security for release of goods, but has no statutory authority to levy penalty. Section 71(3), being a penal provision for offences and consequential proceedings, could not be invoked in the course of detention proceedings. Amounts collected on release of detained goods must therefore be treated in accordance with the detention power exercised and not recharacterised as penalty. The amount paid for release was directed to be treated as tax, while the assessee was left free to pursue any adjustment remedy available under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>