https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4254 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the refund claim under Sec.11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's contention that the duty amount was paid under protest and not passed on to customers was supported by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the duty amount was paid as a deposit subsequent to clearance and was not recovered from customers, contrary to the Senior Departmental Representative's argument. Consequently, the Tribunal provided consequential relief if necessary, ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4254 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the refund claim under Sec.11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's contention that the duty amount was paid under protest and not passed on to customers was supported by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the duty amount was paid as a deposit subsequent to clearance and was not recovered from customers, contrary to the Senior Departmental Representative's argument. Consequently, the Tribunal provided consequential relief if necessary, ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4254