https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330391 The government rejected the Revision Application as time-barred due to the applicant's failure to show sufficient cause for the delay in filing. The decision aligned with Section 35EE (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 10(2) of the Central Excise (Appeal) Rules, 2011, which require timely submission. The rejection was based on procedural grounds, and the merits of the case were not assessed as a result. en-us Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:31:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330391 The government rejected the Revision Application as time-barred due to the applicant's failure to show sufficient cause for the delay in filing. The decision aligned with Section 35EE (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 10(2) of the Central Excise (Appeal) Rules, 2011, which require timely submission. The rejection was based on procedural grounds, and the merits of the case were not assessed as a result. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330391