<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 988 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 13,78,91,547/- as time-barred. The demand of Rs. 35,88,72,223/- was restricted to the normal period of one year from the relevant date, with the appellant entitled to claim the benefit of reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs if proven. The demand of Rs. 4,25,000/- was set aside as time-barred. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for re-quantification of the liability of the demand, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 988 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 13,78,91,547/- as time-barred. The demand of Rs. 35,88,72,223/- was restricted to the normal period of one year from the relevant date, with the appellant entitled to claim the benefit of reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs if proven. The demand of Rs. 4,25,000/- was set aside as time-barred. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for re-quantification of the liability of the demand, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>