<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 981 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330383</link>
    <description>The Central Government rejected the Revision Application challenging the rejection of rebate claims under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The applicant&#039;s argument for simultaneous benefits of Duty Drawback and Rebate of duty paid on final products was not accepted. The rejection was primarily due to the delay in filing the Revision Application, which was found to be time-barred according to statutory provisions. The Central Government emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed timeline for such applications, leading to the dismissal of the Revision Application solely on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 981 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330383</link>
      <description>The Central Government rejected the Revision Application challenging the rejection of rebate claims under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The applicant&#039;s argument for simultaneous benefits of Duty Drawback and Rebate of duty paid on final products was not accepted. The rejection was primarily due to the delay in filing the Revision Application, which was found to be time-barred according to statutory provisions. The Central Government emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed timeline for such applications, leading to the dismissal of the Revision Application solely on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>