<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 980 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330382</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal after dismissing appeals due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. The investigation revealed illegal export of Muriate of Potash (MOP) by mis-declaration and undervaluation. Various parties were implicated in the illegal export chain, with the Adjudicating authority finding evidence of mis-declaration supported by statements and documents. The Tribunal considered jurisdiction issues of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and upheld pre-deposit requirements, directing specific amounts for appellants to deposit within eight weeks to avoid appeal dismissal. Compliance reporting was set for 19.09.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 21:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 980 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330382</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal after dismissing appeals due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. The investigation revealed illegal export of Muriate of Potash (MOP) by mis-declaration and undervaluation. Various parties were implicated in the illegal export chain, with the Adjudicating authority finding evidence of mis-declaration supported by statements and documents. The Tribunal considered jurisdiction issues of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and upheld pre-deposit requirements, directing specific amounts for appellants to deposit within eight weeks to avoid appeal dismissal. Compliance reporting was set for 19.09.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>