<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 978 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that permitted the recovery of an allegedly erroneously refunded amount. The decision was based on evidence showing that the duty amount had not been passed on to customers, as indicated by the Chartered Accountant certificate and entries in the balance sheet and ledger account. The Tribunal found that the refund amount was not mistakenly issued, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 978 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that permitted the recovery of an allegedly erroneously refunded amount. The decision was based on evidence showing that the duty amount had not been passed on to customers, as indicated by the Chartered Accountant certificate and entries in the balance sheet and ledger account. The Tribunal found that the refund amount was not mistakenly issued, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>