<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 143 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; eligibility for refunds for imported CKD parts of cars, overturning the remand orders. The decision emphasized that the bar of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the nature of the Revenue Deposit. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 143 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; eligibility for refunds for imported CKD parts of cars, overturning the remand orders. The decision emphasized that the bar of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the nature of the Revenue Deposit. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>