<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1278 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Cross Objection of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing and dismissing the appeal. The disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was deleted as the AO did not record satisfaction under Rule 8D(1) before invoking Rule 8D(2). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction and following procedural rules, ruling in favor of the assessee based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1278 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Cross Objection of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing and dismissing the appeal. The disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was deleted as the AO did not record satisfaction under Rule 8D(1) before invoking Rule 8D(2). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction and following procedural rules, ruling in favor of the assessee based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>