<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 973 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330375</link>
    <description>An addition towards alleged speculation income cannot be sustained solely on a statement recorded under section 132(4) when the statement is retracted and no independent corroborative material exists. The Court applied the principle that an admission, by itself, is insufficient to justify a tax addition unless supported by evidence, and held that mere suspicion or speculation cannot bring income to tax. The addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 973 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330375</link>
      <description>An addition towards alleged speculation income cannot be sustained solely on a statement recorded under section 132(4) when the statement is retracted and no independent corroborative material exists. The Court applied the principle that an admission, by itself, is insufficient to justify a tax addition unless supported by evidence, and held that mere suspicion or speculation cannot bring income to tax. The addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>