<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 955 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Following judicial precedent, depreciation was allowed on assets fully allowed as income application in previous years, on transferred assets without cost to the assessee, and deficit carry forward for charitable trusts. The Tribunal found no error in the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s conclusion, allowing the assessee&#039;s claims on all three issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 18:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 955 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Following judicial precedent, depreciation was allowed on assets fully allowed as income application in previous years, on transferred assets without cost to the assessee, and deficit carry forward for charitable trusts. The Tribunal found no error in the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s conclusion, allowing the assessee&#039;s claims on all three issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>