<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 529 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals on penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various issues including undervaluation of stock and disallowance of depreciation. The Tribunal found the issues debatable and not warranting penal action, citing relevant case law such as CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products Ltd. and a judgment of the Jurisdictional High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:40:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 529 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals on penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various issues including undervaluation of stock and disallowance of depreciation. The Tribunal found the issues debatable and not warranting penal action, citing relevant case law such as CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products Ltd. and a judgment of the Jurisdictional High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>