<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 76 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184888</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax purposes, only a crystallised and presently existing tax liability qualifies as a &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Amounts already quantified and demanded under section 18A and section 29 of the Indian Income-tax Act were treated as deductible debts because they had become ascertainable obligations on the valuation date. By contrast, a reserve created for anticipated or future income-tax liability was only a provision for a possible demand and had not yet crystallised into an existing debt. The sums demanded were deductible, but the reserve for anticipated tax liability was not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 76 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184888</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax purposes, only a crystallised and presently existing tax liability qualifies as a &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Amounts already quantified and demanded under section 18A and section 29 of the Indian Income-tax Act were treated as deductible debts because they had become ascertainable obligations on the valuation date. By contrast, a reserve created for anticipated or future income-tax liability was only a provision for a possible demand and had not yet crystallised into an existing debt. The sums demanded were deductible, but the reserve for anticipated tax liability was not.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>