<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4241</link>
    <description>Waste and scrap collected by sweeping a factory floor, where no separate process attributable to the assessee produced it, does not constitute goods manufactured by the assessee for excise-duty purposes. The demand therefore could not rest on treating such incidental sweeping waste as manufactured scrap. The extended limitation period was also unavailable because the alleged non-filing of a declaration did not establish suppression or intent to evade duty once the underlying allegation of manufactured scrap failed. Consequently, the excise demand was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4241</link>
      <description>Waste and scrap collected by sweeping a factory floor, where no separate process attributable to the assessee produced it, does not constitute goods manufactured by the assessee for excise-duty purposes. The demand therefore could not rest on treating such incidental sweeping waste as manufactured scrap. The extended limitation period was also unavailable because the alleged non-filing of a declaration did not establish suppression or intent to evade duty once the underlying allegation of manufactured scrap failed. Consequently, the excise demand was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>