<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1011 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184876</link>
    <description>Profit from share transactions must be classified by examining the cumulative effect of relevant factors, including the assessee&#039;s intention at purchase, treatment in the accounts, frequency and magnitude of transactions, holding period, and whether a separate investment portfolio was maintained. Although the shares were shown as investments in the books and that treatment had been accepted earlier, the short holding periods and repeated transactions pointed to trading features. As the material needed to apply the holding-period and transaction-frequency criteria was incomplete, the matter required re-examination by the Assessing Officer and income was to be recomputed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1011 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184876</link>
      <description>Profit from share transactions must be classified by examining the cumulative effect of relevant factors, including the assessee&#039;s intention at purchase, treatment in the accounts, frequency and magnitude of transactions, holding period, and whether a separate investment portfolio was maintained. Although the shares were shown as investments in the books and that treatment had been accepted earlier, the short holding periods and repeated transactions pointed to trading features. As the material needed to apply the holding-period and transaction-frequency criteria was incomplete, the matter required re-examination by the Assessing Officer and income was to be recomputed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>