https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184869 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding the specific transaction related to Flat No. A/204 and dismissed appeals for other years. The addition of unaccounted payments made to the architect was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence for additions based on seized documents and the validity of retracting statements within a reasonable time. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184869 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding the specific transaction related to Flat No. A/204 and dismissed appeals for other years. The addition of unaccounted payments made to the architect was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence for additions based on seized documents and the validity of retracting statements within a reasonable time. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184869