https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184864 A later beneficial family pension resolution could not be applied beyond its express field of operation: although it removed the minimum service requirement, it was confined to employees in service on 1 January 1986, which the claimant's deceased spouse was not. The claim therefore failed under the 1987 resolution. A fresh constitutional challenge to that resolution could not be raised for the first time in appeal, and the earlier rejection of the five-year minimum service requirement under the 1972 pension scheme could not be reopened. The High Court's grant of family pension was accordingly unsustainable and the writ petition stood dismissed. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:46:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184864 A later beneficial family pension resolution could not be applied beyond its express field of operation: although it removed the minimum service requirement, it was confined to employees in service on 1 January 1986, which the claimant's deceased spouse was not. The claim therefore failed under the 1987 resolution. A fresh constitutional challenge to that resolution could not be raised for the first time in appeal, and the earlier rejection of the five-year minimum service requirement under the 1972 pension scheme could not be reopened. The High Court's grant of family pension was accordingly unsustainable and the writ petition stood dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184864