https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184861 Section 57 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 was analysed as a preventive externment measure against persons previously convicted of specified offences and likely to repeat them, and it was treated as a reasonable restriction on the freedoms of movement and residence under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) because the scheme provided notice, opportunity to explain, representation, appeal, and limited judicial review. The absence of an advisory board did not by itself invalidate the provision. The externment order was also upheld because the authority relied on a prior conviction and surrounding material showing likelihood of repetition; prior acquittals or discharges did not prevent consideration of the underlying facts, and no procedural illegality or absence of material was shown. en-us Tue, 08 May 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:32:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184861 Section 57 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 was analysed as a preventive externment measure against persons previously convicted of specified offences and likely to repeat them, and it was treated as a reasonable restriction on the freedoms of movement and residence under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) because the scheme provided notice, opportunity to explain, representation, appeal, and limited judicial review. The absence of an advisory board did not by itself invalidate the provision. The externment order was also upheld because the authority relied on a prior conviction and surrounding material showing likelihood of repetition; prior acquittals or discharges did not prevent consideration of the underlying facts, and no procedural illegality or absence of material was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 May 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184861