<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 518 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184855</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted against recovery of an enhanced penalty pending appeal, because the appellant had already secured stay relief on the earlier demand and penalty and the challenge to the confirmation order was still pending. The Tribunal treated the dispute as fit to be considered together with the main appeal and waived the pre-deposit of the penalty imposed in the impugned order until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 518 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184855</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted against recovery of an enhanced penalty pending appeal, because the appellant had already secured stay relief on the earlier demand and penalty and the challenge to the confirmation order was still pending. The Tribunal treated the dispute as fit to be considered together with the main appeal and waived the pre-deposit of the penalty imposed in the impugned order until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>