https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330334 The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2008-09, despite typographical errors. It dismissed objections regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer and clarified that the notice was validly issued. However, it found the notice in violation of Section 92CA (2C) due to an international transaction completed before the specified date. The court directed the Assessing Officer to consider the petitioner's objections related to Section 92CA (2C) and granted a stay on the notice for ten weeks for further challenge. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330334 The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2008-09, despite typographical errors. It dismissed objections regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer and clarified that the notice was validly issued. However, it found the notice in violation of Section 92CA (2C) due to an international transaction completed before the specified date. The court directed the Assessing Officer to consider the petitioner's objections related to Section 92CA (2C) and granted a stay on the notice for ten weeks for further challenge. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330334