<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 709 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184849</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, upholding the AO and ITAT&#039;s decision. The Court determined that the income from the sale of land was undisclosed, as it was not recorded in the books before the search date, thereby justifying the block assessment and higher tax rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 709 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184849</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, upholding the AO and ITAT&#039;s decision. The Court determined that the income from the sale of land was undisclosed, as it was not recorded in the books before the search date, thereby justifying the block assessment and higher tax rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>