<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Entitled to Refund of Excess Duty Paid; Amount Classified as Deposit, Not Subject to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30424</link>
    <description>Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess paid is only an amount deposited by appellant, not being duty is not hit by doctrine of unjust enrichment. - appellant is eligible for refund - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:37:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:37:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Entitled to Refund of Excess Duty Paid; Amount Classified as Deposit, Not Subject to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30424</link>
      <description>Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess paid is only an amount deposited by appellant, not being duty is not hit by doctrine of unjust enrichment. - appellant is eligible for refund - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:37:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>